Source: The Korea Herald / Asia News Network
Wednesday, Aug 15, 2012
Binge-drinking in Korea was once viewed as a relatively harmless
deviation among the nation's workaholics, but its burden on public money and
social capital is starting to prompt action.
The cost
of premature death caused by alcohol exceeded 3 trillion won (S$3.23 billion) in
2007 and is likely to have risen since.
The
government has been tightening the regulatory system. Drinking in public parks
will be banned from next year. In Seoul, there are proposals prohibiting
drinking in school areas, youth centers and hospitals.
But none
of the proposals touch on a significant aspect of the problem: Alcohol is
cheap.
Soju is by
far the most popular alcoholic beverage in Korea with a 51 per cent share of the
market.
Its low
price, roughly 1,200 won for a 350 ml bottle, coupled with a high alcohol
content of roughly 20 per cent have made it the favourite drink across all
incomes.
The cost
of producing a bottle of soju is less than 400 won, and the price has increased
at a slower rate than inflation since 2008, when President Lee Myung-bak froze
the prices of 52 items including soju as part of a policy to limit the effects
of inflation and economic difficulties on the working
class.
Indeed,
soju has an image of being a companion and a comfort for the working
class.
The irony,
according to former Hongik University professor Jang Geun-ho ? now a director in
the Ministry of Strategy and Finance ? is that the low price of soju may not
necessarily benefit the poor but do just the opposite.
In 2006,
there were discussions in the government of raising the tax on alcoholic
beverages relative to their level of alcohol by volume. Park Byong-won, then
vice minister in the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, said, "It is a global
trend to raise the duty on alcoholic beverages with high
content."
The
argument adopted by the government was also well supported by scholars in the
field.
According
to Park Sang-won, a researcher at the Korea Institute of Public Finance, since
it is the amount of alcohol and not the quantity of liquid that causes social
problems, the government should tax various alcoholic beverages
differently.
For
example, beer and soju are taxed equally in Korea. Korea is one of only three
OECD countries to tax alcohol in this way.
All the
other OECD countries instead have a specific commercial duty on alcohol,
generally levying more tax on higher-strength drinks.
But this
policy met fierce opposition from Korean lawmakers, who cited the effect of
price rises on the poor.
Nonetheless, extensive studies show increasing the duty on
high-percentage alcoholic beverages may not affect the finances of the poor as
much as the lawmakers claim it would.
Research
published by Korea Alcohol Research Center in 2010 shows the real and more
substantial culprits of Korea's binge drinking culture are the
wealthy.
As income
rises, so does alcohol consumption, frequency and the likelihood of binge
drinking. In other words, the wealthy tend to spend more money on drinking than
the poor.
Even in
the United States, studies show that raising the price of alcoholic beverages
has little effect on the poor.
No comments:
Post a Comment