Source: Stuff
JOHN HARTEVELT
13/08/2012
Pressure
is going on National to allow its MPs a conscience vote on liquor law reforms,
sparking concerns about "absolute chaos" in Parliament's debating
chamber.
Parliament's business committee, which agrees on the order of
debates, is tomorrow set to map out the process for the Alcohol Reform Bill to
finally progress.
The bill
has been stalled for months as the Government tries to clear space on the Order
Paper for it to pass the committee stages.
Changes in
the bill include splitting the drinking age by restricting alcohol sales at
off-licences to 20-year-olds while leaving it at 18 for licensed
premises.
The
banning of off-licence sales of ready-to-drink beverages with more than 6 per
cent alcohol, restricting display of alcohol to "non-prominent" areas in
supermarkets and grocery stores, and plans to clamp down on alcohol advertising
are also on the table.
National
will only allow its MPs a conscience vote on the age of alcohol purchase part of
the bill.
But
Labour's 34 MPs will be allowed a conscience vote on the whole bill, including
amendments put up by its own MPs.
Labour's
shadow leader of the House, Trevor Mallard, said National should also give its
MPs a free vote on the whole bill.
"If they
don't, then a lot of their individual MPs will be put in an awful position
vis-a-vis their electorates," Mr Mallard said.
"I think
there is a general view that a lot of this [alcohol law reform] stuff is going
in the right direction but not far enough."
He
admitted conscience votes on liquor laws had been "messy" in the past because
late, inconsistent and poorly drafted amendments had been passed. That had made
the law "unnecessarily untidy as a result", he said.
But Labour
would put up its substantive amendments much earlier this time, he
said.
Green MP
Kevin Hague said the bill was pathetic and needed to be made tougher, but there
was "nothing magical about alcohol" that made it suitable for a conscience
vote.
"They
[Labour] are aware that quite a number of National Party MPs actually agree with
us and agree with the experts on public health that the bill doesn't go nearly
far enough on availability and marketing and some of those other areas," Mr
Hague said.
"Their
hope is probably to try and change National's behaviour so that National also
agrees to conscience votes on those things, in which case, maybe there would be
the numbers for stronger measures."
It seemed
unlikely that National would be swayed to allow a total conscience vote,
however.
"Having a
sensible sequence of voting on these [amendments] is going to be important to
do, otherwise it could be absolute chaos in the House."
Justice
Minister Judith Collins, who is leading the bill, said she was concerned that
Labour "can't come up with a coherent position" on the bill, which was "going to
cause difficulties during the entire voting process".
"I think
they're having difficulty getting a party position on anything and they're
wanting to inflict that on everyone else."
No comments:
Post a Comment